Search | Home | Contact Us | WB Home   
Search in WDR 2003 Web:

     
  Purchase a hardcopy >>  
    -How to Order
    -Geographic Discounts



Chapter 3: Institutions for Sustainable Development --> Promoting inclusiveness --> Protecting people - and the emergence of protective institutions for assets
Chapter 3: Institutions for Sustainable Development

<<--- Previous Section: Importance of voice

--->> Next Section: What does inclusiveness in access to assets have to do with sustainable development?


Protecting people - and the emergence of protective institutions for assets

When institutions such as the law, and the agencies supporting the law, become more inclusive, more people are given protection, voice, and support. And when institutions are more inclusive-listening to and supporting more people-a broader range of assets can thrive (boxes 3.4, 3.8, 3.9, and 3.10 illuminate different aspects of this). The reason is that assets need guardians and spokespersons. Assets therefore may fail to be served if the people who benefit from these assets are not well served by-or represented in-institutions. For private assets, more inclusive institutions facilitate development and asset accumulation as more people feel safe in their homes and find promising outlets for their savings. For communal and natural assets (roads, water, fish, or forests), more inclusive institutions deepen the support for their provision, so that their quality and quantity can rise. Consider what happened in Cubatão, Brazil, where inclusiveness in the form of democratization and the end of media censorship shifted the balance toward civil society and a cleaner environment (box 6.8). In many countries, social movements pressing for democratization and environmental improvements have reinforced each other (box 3.9).

Box 3.9

Mutual reinforcement: environmental movements and democracy

In many places environmental movements arose in the 1980s in the midst of broader social movements for democratization. Democratization and environmentalism have developed together but in diverse ways. In the Republic of Korea social movements for democratization, labor, and environmental protection joined forces in opposition to authoritarian rule in the 1980s. In Taiwan (China) the environmental and prodemocracy movements were the two strongest social mobilizations. An estimated 582 environmental protests occurred there between 1983 and 1988-one-fifth of public protests during this period. In Brazil disparate environmental organizations that had kept a low profile during military rule were animated and united when they helped draft the environmental chapter of the new national constitution during 1985-88. In the former Soviet Union, civic environmental organizations flourished in the early years, were crushed under Stalin, resurfaced in limited form during the political liberalization of the 1950s, and exploded as a central component of mass movements for democratization in the late 1980s.

Source: Mirovitskaya (1998); Anbarasan and Yul (2001); Lee and others (1999); Hochstetler (1997)

How can protective institutions be formed to give dispersed interests effective channels? In a wide range of cases, society relies on guardians, or custodians, to look over something of value. An example is when participatory approaches in projects ask people to speak their mind. The presumption behind this empowering people's voice is not only that people have a right to speak on their own behalf. It is also that city people, for example, can benefit from hearing from people in more remote areas about what goes on in the forest, about the effects of cutting trees or damming rivers.

For people to be functional guardians, they must be well-endowed and feel safe. As an illustration, all societies rely on parents to protect and nurture children. It happens that this protection fails-as when children are sold into slavery or prostitution. This is not because parents are not their guardians-they are-but because of the family's poverty and despair.

This need to have well-endowed guardians places broad-based development and poverty reduction at the heart of concerns for environmental and other communal assets. More inclusive access to assets (human capital, a piece of land, or a plot for housing) can change people's perspectives, allowing them to be more forward looking and engaged in their communities. When people have assets-and thus a stake in the future and in the community-it is also easier to build support for institutions, public goods, and publicly provided goods such as rule of law, watershed management, and schooling.


<<--- Previous Section: Importance of voice

--->> Next Section: What does inclusiveness in access to assets have to do with sustainable development?


Search | Home | WB Home
© 2003 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions